From the top

by

The Labour Government may have finally found a solution to its problem of asylum seekers arriving by boat.  The Government is proposing a deal with the Malaysian Government in which boat borne asylum seekers arriving in Australia would be sent to Malaysia where they will go to the end of the queue of 100,000 asylum seekers.  In return Australia will take a multiple of approved asylum seekers from the top of the list.  This seems like the making of an ideal solution.

I would favour an agreement with Malaysia that went as follows:

1.  Australia agrees to take a minimum of 5000 asylum seekers from Malaysia each year, as an increment to our existing immigration program.  Those persons will be from the top of the list of applicants in Malaysia who are acceptable to Australia.

2.  In return Malaysia will accept up to 1250 persons per year who go to the bottom of the asylum seeker processing queue.  If there are more than 1250 persons sent from Australia to Malaysia in a year then 4 persons will come to Australia from Malaysia for each sent to Malaysia.

I know it is repugnant to speak of human lives as if they were tonnes of iron ore, but there is no other to discuss the matter.

This arrangement would reduce overall human suffering and bring boat arrivals to an end.  That has to be close to the best solution we can get to the problem of boat borne asylum seekers.  The incentives are so right here.  Who will pay a large amount of money and risk death at sea to arrive in Australia only to be put at the end of the queue in Malaysia?  Nobody.  If the arrangement is maintained, then boat arrivals will end, for sure.  So long as there is no collusion between persons at the top of the list with those at the bottom, then this is an ideal solution.

The antipathy toward boat borne asylum seekers has several components.  One is that some people don’t want to accept asylum seekers, no matter how they arrive.  This proposal is worse for that group because it leads to more arrivals overall.  Then there are others, like me, who are happy with the current, or an expanded, acceptance of refugees but don’t like arrivals by boat because it rewards queue jumping and is against the rule of law.  I think the second group is the larger part of opposition to acceptance of boat borne asylum seekers.  This is a solution for that group.

 

4 Responses to "From the top"
  1. Robert
    I don’t know which law.  
    The point I was trying to make is that there are multiple forms of the antipathy toward boat borne asylum seekers:
    1.  Racism: Opposition to taking any refugees or even any immigrants who are not European.
    2.  Small Australia:  Opposition to taking any immigrants of any kind.   
    3.  Security:  Concern that Australia will lose control of its borders.   
    4.  Equity:  The belief that boat borne asylum seekers are queue jumpers.  

    3 and 1 are not completely separable. 

    For people who’s beliefs include 3 and/or 4 but not 1 or 2, then the Malaysian solution, if properly implemented, is a good one.   

    I think most of the antipathy to boat borne asylum seekers in Australia is in categories 3 and 4 above.  

    Sam

  2. Sam,
     
    Why are you perpetuating the myth of some “queue”?
     
    This is a summary worth reading:
     
    “Few countries between the Middle East and Australia are signatories to the 1951 Refugee Convention, and as such, asylum seekers are forced to travel to another country to find protection. People who are afraid of their lives have been fleeing from the world’s most brutal regimes including the Taliban in Afghanistan and Saddam Hussein’s dictatorship in Iraq.
     
    In any case, for several decades now Australia’s immigration program has had onshore and offshore components, which allowed people to seek asylum as refugees from outside as well as from within Australia. The offshore humanitarian component has been determined by various priorities and criteria established by the Australian government.
     
    In other words Australia has “picked/chosen” who it wanted and it certainly has not been on the basis of their place in a “queue”. It is therefore duplicitous to talk of asylum seekers depriving more deserving refugees languishing in refugee camps around the world.
     
    The only queue jumping that occurs in relation to Australia’s immigration program is a direct consequence of the uneven distribution of its overseas immigration staff. Consequently, from a global perspective, immigrants are not processed in the order that they apply to migrate to Australia. Some are able to “jump the queue” if they apply from countries which have a disproportionate share of these staff.”
     
    See http://www.portphillip.vic.gov.au/…/Facts_and_myths_on_Asylum_Seekers.doc for more

     

  3. Andre
    Almost all of the boats that arrive in Australia carrying asylum seekers leave from Indonesia.  So, we probably forget about the other countries in this conversation.  If Indonesia has a UN processing centre for asylum seekers, then all it takes for queue jumping to be a valid concern is for Australia to have a quota of asylum seekers that it takes from UN centres.  
    Sam

%d bloggers like this:
PageLines